Season 3, Episode 44 (Show 148): Speakerless
October 25, 2023
We continue our analysis of the many issues that the absence of a Speaker of the House raises, and we look at how this relates to the crisis in the Middle East and the overall functioning and purpose of our constitutional system. CLE Credit Available for this episode.
Still no speaker. Is it really the case that the House can’t do anything? How might it work? What about Section 3 of the 14th Amendment – does it play any role in the Speaker selection process? Meanwhile, we turn towards the other Jordan and see the dangers of insecure borders that are inherently hard to defend. Professor Amar explains how this simple fact led him to insights that resulted in a constitutional narrative quite different from those you may have been taught, and which makes certain predictions and conclusions. Does it stand up? We begin a process, which we will return to, of seeing where it leads us. A sweeping episode.
(LAWYERS AND JUDGES ARE ELIGIBLE FOR CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION CREDIT by visiting podcast.njsba.com after listening.)
Show Notes:
Season 3, Episode 43 (Show 147): A Tale of Two Jordans
October 18, 2023
Another Speaker stalemate in the House raises constitutional issues galore, and we begin to explore connections with a far-away conflict in the Middle East. CLE Credit Available for this episode.
The House is at it again, and there is no Speaker in the chair as of this recording. So many implications – for Presidential succession, for democratic governance, for legislative stalemate. Meanwhile violence escalates in the Middle East. How are these connected? We explore all these, and Akhil has some fascinating originalist analyses – of history you surely didn’t know; of structural reasons that the Speaker can’t be in the line of succession; and a new textual analysis. Meanwhile – why can’t the House act? Has this happened before? (Hint: yes)
(LAWYERS AND JUDGES ARE ELIGIBLE FOR CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION CREDIT by visiting podcast.njsba.com after listening.)
Show Notes:
Season 3, Episode 42 (Show 146): Allen and Affirmative Action Again
October 11, 2023
Voting rights in Alabama, and affirmative action elsewhere, seemingly settled, rear their heads again. Two issues, but Professor Amar finds the common constitutional concept. NOTE: Lawyers and Judges – Visit podcast.njsba.com for CLE credit after listening.
After the Court decided important voting rights and affirmative action cases last term, these issues are back either before the Court or apparently headed for it. Why? We look at Allen v. Milligan, and affirmative action in the service academies, and find that the bounce-back of what seem to be entirely unrelated cases in fact demonstrates important constitutional and indeed originalist principles. And who is at the center of all this? Justice Kavanaugh, once again.
(LAWYERS AND JUDGES ARE ELIGIBLE FOR CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION CREDIT by visiting podcast.njsba.com after listening.)
Show Notes:
Subscribe to “Amarica’s Constitution” by clicking “Subscribe” or “Follow” after selecting your preferred podcast app below.
Season 3, Episode 41 (Show 145): Eleven Presidents – Special Guest Bob Woodward
October 4, 2023
In an extraordinary 90 minutes, Bob Woodward offers a perspective on the Presidency, the Supreme Court, and the nation and its Constitution from a perch of experience and objectivity that we may never see again. NOTE: Lawyers and Judges – Visit podcast.njsba.com for CLE credit after listening.
The career of America’s greatest investigative reporter has spanned more than 50 years, and Bob Woodward has told the stories of eleven presidents, the Supreme Court, the Intelligence Community, and indeed the American political system with a penetrating, persistent drive towards the truth. (LAWYERS AND JUDGES ARE ELIGIBLE FOR CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION CREDIT by visiting podcast.njsba.com after listening.) Today this titan spends 90 minutes with us, and the insights continue to pour out of him. One can’t help but see Nixon at one end and Trump near the other; Woodward certainly sees them, and even with his ever-present professional distance and restraint, it’s powerful to hear the most deeply informed perspective there has ever been on the Constitution’s most ambitious creation – the Presidency – and the extraordinarily aberrant occupants of that office.
Show Notes:
Season 3, Episode 40 (Show 144): Have Kavanaugh, Will Travel
September 27, 2023
The Court prepares to sit for the new term, and the Dobbs decision continues to reverberate. We look at the aftermath and where the law, the Court, and the country are headed in its wake.
It’s almost October, and the Supreme Court readies to hear a new set of cases. The Roberts Court seems defined above all by the Dobbs decision at this point. The opinion, authored by Justice Alito, has been exhaustively dissected, but looking forward, we see various states taking further and more extreme actions. What role will the so-called swing justices, some of whom wrote concurrences in the case, play in the litigation that the new developments will likely spawn? What of the dire predictions of many pundits in the aftermath of the case? And what about Amarica’s Constitution – what did we say, and what say we now? Travel the road with us.
Show Notes:
Season 3, Episode 39 (Show 143): Justice Jackson’s Santa Clause
September 20, 2023
Judicial Ethics, the 303 case, art history, and we start to pull the curtain on a big announcement, all this week on a potpourri that somehow finds it all interrelated.
It’s an assortment of topics as listeners response to some recent developments and nagging questions. We revisit the 303 case, specifically the dissent, as Justice Jackson lays out an interesting hypothetical that doesn’t produce, perhaps, the intended response – at least from Professor Amar. Meanwhile, Justice Alito is back in the news with his judicial Declaration of Independence – Akhil may not quite agree. We also have an exciting prelude to a big announcement about our podcast!