Season 4, Episode 13 (Show 170): History Will Judge
March 27, 2024
Justice Barrett’s concurrence is analyzed, the audience’s many questions are addressed, and the news media is recapped in a wide-ranging potpurri podcast.
CLE Credit Available for this episode from podcast.njsba.com.
We round up our analysis of the opinion in Trump v. Anderson with Justice Barrett’s concurrence. All of this has raised many questions, particularly in light of the Court’s errant reasoning and other shenanigans. And it turns out that many of the best questions come from you, our audience! So we turn to those as well, both about Section 3, and other matters as well. We also look at the news media’s latest interesting directions, including takes on Justice Breyer’s new book and seeds planted by Professor Amar bearing fruit.
(LAWYERS AND JUDGES ARE ELIGIBLE FOR CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION CREDIT by visiting podcast.njsba.com after listening.)