Season 4, Episode 9 (Show 166): Staking our Claim

February 28, 2024

As new evidence appears that seems crucial in Trump v. Anderson, the Court has remained silent. Will they see the evidence and possibly consider it? Also – Moore v. US oral argument clips and their relation to our brief in that case.

CLE Credit Available for this episode from podcast.njsba.com.

As we return, we’re still waiting for the opinion in Trump v. Anderson, and it gives us a chance to highlight important new evidence that has come to light – thanks in large part to Professor Amar’s great law student team.  It fatally undermines what seemed likely to be the reasoning the opinion was going to take.  Will it matter?  This is related to the role amici play in the Court ecosystem, and we look at how another case we had a brief in, Moore v. US, seemed to be possibly influenced by our brief by beginning our long-promised clip-based analysis of that oral argument. So a whole lot in a compact episode. 

(LAWYERS AND JUDGES ARE ELIGIBLE FOR CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION CREDIT by visiting podcast.njsba.com after listening.)

Show Notes: